Some of these questions have apparently clear-cut answers, but none are simply answered in one or two sentences. Representation of another, taking responsibility for another, is a solemn undertaking. Representatives’ actions can stand between the claimant and life, or, failing adequate representation, illness and demise. In such an undertaking, no easy answers are possible; each case is unique. However, there are several important principles to keep in mind. For example, in the foregoing scenario of a person that has been given two incorrect presumptions about service as a representative in a Social Security disability case. First, a Grand Rapids social security lawyer is not simply someone who processes the forms and paperwork involved in making a disability claim. The representative takes an active role, indeed, a proactive role, assisting the claimant in obtaining evidence, making certain all necessary information is provided on the claimant’s behalf, and serving as the claimant’s advocate with the Social Security Administration generally, and DDS and OHA specifically, both in writing and orally, at a hearing.
Second, a representative can be either a lawyer or a non-lawyer. Within the Administration, representative has come to mean non-lawyer, whereas attorneys are simply referred to as such. Technically, however, under governing regulations, both are representatives. Regardless of whether a representative is an attorney or a non-lawyer, Social Security disability claims have become complex, specialized areas of the law that demand as much study of the pertinent law and knowledge of the facts of a particular case as any other form of litigation.
The declared non adversarial character of these administrative proceedings should not lull a representative into a sense that he or she must simply monitor the process and let the SSA adjudicators and their staffs do most of the work to develop the case. Just the opposite is true. While the proceedings before the DDS and ultimately OHA are non-adversarial in the sense that the process is aimed at determining eligibility for an “entitlement” program, the question being whether the claimant is entitled to benefits, and not whether he or she can “trump” the government’s case; or otherwise prevail in a clash of conflicting proofs; the representative is required to be persuasive in marshaling the evidence and presenting the client’s case. Because whether the representative is an attorney or a non-lawyer, the obligations to the claimant are fiduciary in nature. It is important that one find the best Grand Rapids social security lawyer who is certified and licensed.
The Author is conveying information about http://www.disabilitylawgrandrapids.com/contact/ and Grand Rapids social security lawyer. You're probably thinking, everyone says that, so, what's different here. It's the commitment of quality, genuineness, and a guarantee that values your time and interest.
Hiring a Grand Rapids Social Security Lawyer