A single session in court, whether state or federal, always takes every detail profoundly to work things properly. While many people understand just how serious a court session can get no matter the nature of the case, expect a handful of people to make a total joke out of it. In the US justice system, people always take these "frivolous lawsuits seriously". If a claim is not sound enough, do not appeal it to court anyway.
Law books call this practice "frivolous litigation"-- the act of declaring legal claims though such a claim has limited to no chance of winning. In other words, a particular claim can be referred as frivolous if the court sees it as down-to-earth absurd. One example of a frivolous lawsuit involved a man filing a claim against Michael Jordan, a former NBA player, and the footwear brand Nike for $ 832 million. The ground for this is that many people mistake the complainant for the former basketball player.
Even ordinary people can ponder vast of ways to refute this type of argument, in which the plaintiff ultimately backed out of from the lawsuit. To stay clear of these type of claims, lawyers turn to the Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This guideline needs lawyers to dive deep into a particular case by properly auditing the facts to determine whether or not the claim is good.
As a frivolous lawsuit presented in court only wastes important judiciary resources, the court has the right to enforce sanctions to prevent it from happening. The penalties vary depending on the nature of the claim and the kind of court managing the case. For instance, any frivolous claim presented before the United States Tax Court can result in around $ 25,000 of penalty as per the Internal Revenue Code. It is for this reason that a Utah bankruptcy attorney should scrutinize a claim adequately.
A possible explanation for some people to file frivolous lawsuits can be attributed to the amount of cash involved as compensation. In the aforesaid instance, the man required $ 832 million in defamatory losses, although some experts find the figure extremely dubious. Remember that the judiciary system exists as an arbiter to settle conflicts and compensate those who deserve to be compensated. Even the Utah personal injury attorney will definitely tell you this.
The Utah personal injury attorney is accountable for guaranteeing that any suit his clients make holds water. Furthermore, the complainant himself is also responsible for exercising prudence and sincerity in making legal claims. The judicial body, in general, will consistently be more than delighted to settle any sort of authentic dispute. Nonetheless, the adjudicator may not look happy with a frivolous claim.
How a Utah Attorney Can Help You